Collaboration diagram for P1_CouplingAssembler:

Public Member Functions
	P1_CouplingAssembler (const DarcyFlowMH_Steady &darcy)

void	assembly (LinSys &ls)

void	add_sides (const Element *ele, unsigned int shift, vector< int > &dofs, vector< double > &dirichlet)

Detailed Description

Definition at line 406 of file darcy_flow_mh.hh.

Constructor & Destructor Documentation

P1_CouplingAssembler::P1_CouplingAssembler ( const DarcyFlowMH_Steady & darcy )

inline

Definition at line 408 of file darcy_flow_mh.hh.

void P1_CouplingAssembler::add_sides	(	const Element *	ele,
		unsigned int	shift,
		vector< int > &	dofs,
		vector< double > &	dirichlet
	)

Definition at line 683 of file darcy_flow_mh.cc.

void P1_CouplingAssembler::assembly ( LinSys & ls )

P1 coonection of different dimensions

demonstrated convergence, but still major open questions: ? in all test cases the error on the fracture is less on the left and greater on the right with incresing trend tried:
- changed order of 1d elements (no change)
- higher precision of ngh output and linear solver (no change) ? seems that there should be some factor 6.0 in the communication term ? in the case of infinite k2 -> simplest 1d-constant communication, the biggest difference on borders, numerical solution greater then analytical

TODO:

Definition at line 721 of file darcy_flow_mh.cc.

const DarcyFlowMH_Steady& P1_CouplingAssembler::darcy_

private

Definition at line 422 of file darcy_flow_mh.hh.

vector<double> P1_CouplingAssembler::dirichlet

private

Definition at line 427 of file darcy_flow_mh.hh.

vector<int> P1_CouplingAssembler::dofs

private

Definition at line 426 of file darcy_flow_mh.hh.

const vector<Intersection>& P1_CouplingAssembler::intersections_

private

Definition at line 423 of file darcy_flow_mh.hh.

arma::vec P1_CouplingAssembler::rhs

private

Definition at line 425 of file darcy_flow_mh.hh.

The documentation for this class was generated from the following files: